sexta-feira, 9 de maio de 2014

Que vergonha PT! Pelo jeito os Jogos Olimpicos de 2016 não vão mais ser realizados no Rio e sim em Londres.


IOC chiefs 'make secret plea' to use London 2012 venues as Rio 2016 Olympic Games fall behind schedule

An informal approach has been made by IOC chiefs to ascertain whether enough of the London 2012 Olympic venues could be brought back into use, report claims

IOC chiefs make secret plea to use London 2012 venues as Rio 2016 Olympic Games fall worryingly behind schedule
On the defensive: Rio's Eduardo Paes (right) does his best to placate an IOC Evaluation Commission Photo: AP

So worried are Olympic organisers by how far behind schedule the 2016 Rio Games has fallen, London has reportedly been asked, in secret, if it could host the event at the last minute.
According to the London Evening Standard, an informal approach has been made by IOC chiefs to ascertain whether London's 2012 Olympic venues could be brought back into use.
The build-up to the Rio Games has been labelled a shambles, with every venue badly behind schedule, spiralling costs and accusations of negligence.
IOC vice-president John Coates has already called Brazil's preparations "the worst I've experienced", with just two years to go and a football World Cup to host in between. 
An "unprecedented" special task force has been set up to try and speed up preparations but the situation on the ground is said to be "critical".
A source told the Standard: "At a comparable planning stage in 2004 Athens had done 40 per cent of preparations on infrastructure, stadiums and so on. London had done 60 per cent. Brazil has done 10 per cent - and they have just two years left. So the IOC is thinking, 'What's our plan B?'
"Obviously, the answer would be to come back to London. It's very unlikely but it would be the logical thing to do." 

London has hosted the Olympics in an emergency before. In 1908 the event was due to be held in Italy, but Mount Vesuvius erupting forced a move. 

However, 'London 2016' would be a "worst-case scenario" because many of the 2012 sites have already been converted into public use. The cost of upgrading them to competition-standard again would cost millions, not to mention that the athletes' village is now populated by private residents.

Indeed, a spokeswoman for the International Olympic Committee said the question of the Rio Games being moved to London was a "non-starter and unfeasible".

OS COMENTÁRIOS DOS LEITORES SÃO AINDA MAIS HUMILHANTES:




Was just in Brazil in March, passed through Sao Paolo. Shambles. For a start the major airport is like ONE small terminal at Luton for a city of 20+m. The bureaucracy to get in is about the same as the UK BUT it's actually worse trying to leave the country: about 10 minutes to process each passenger. The crime is staggering. My Brit friends there all have to use armoured cars, one family were held at gunpoint in their home. The poverty, even after a generation of "socialist" govt is worse than ever. The mobile phone networks are already choked to capacity and fabulously expensive. It just isn't worth the trip for the footie or olympics. On a side note, shouldn't we get a regular audit of all the IOC and FIFA voters for a few years after the events have been awarded? Just like all medalists have automatic doping tests. Seems sensible dont you think?



Really?The IOC didn't see this coming? Brazil is filled with Brazilians. Enough said.


I actually know someone who died in a Brazilian plane crash. That's how frequently sh-t happens in this country.
 
If the Rio Olympics are going to fail, they should just let it fail. That will teach the IOC to not give the games to third world countries.
  • Are there enough British troops left for security?

  • Brazil will never be ready at this rate. That country in clogged with crime and poverty anyway. This was not a good idea.



    Rio ..... a toilet of a city. Why hold those games in a third world country with almost no stability? Never should have gone there in the first place.

Nenhum comentário: